AI agents investigate every alert, add context, and prepare cases for response, on a full-stack SecOps platform that captures and correlates all your security data.
Cloud-based SIEM platform providing visibility across all your data sources
Every alert investigated, with a verdict and the evidence behind it
Manage your external footprint, publicly available data, and Dark Web leaks
Log management and threat detection across any of your log sources
Get ultimate assurance that your environment is free from threat actors
Fully featured distrubuted NDR for on-premises and public cloud environments
A SecOps platform purpose-built for industrial and OT environments
Integrated endpoint agent providing deep visibility, response and forensics
Deploy honeypots and honeytokens and stay ahead of threat actors
24x7 security operations from our Australian SOC. AI investigates every alert, and experienced analysts validate findings and contain threats around the clock.
24x7 managed detection and response across endpoint, network, cloud, identity, and log sources
AI investigations and 24x7 MDR on the Microsoft Sentinel you already own
Eyes-on-glass SOC and continuous threat hunting
Expert hunters and AI agents find attacker activity your alerts missed
Quickly recover from cyber attacks and breaches
ThreatDefence is the only SecOps as a Service company providing broad coverage across your entire technology stack with evidence-based security.
We provide security teams with full-stack SecOps infrastructure – you get deep visibility from day one, gain control over your security data, and get access to a comprehensive set of ready-to-use tools, detections, workflows, playbooks and scenarios.
24x7 SOC, Continuous Monitoring, Threat Containment and Incident Response
Visibility and actionable insights for all IT assets
Leverage our Cyber Range to train defenders based on real-world scenarios and simulations
OT and industrial cyber security services for critical infrastructure
Monitoring, evidence and a 24x7 SOC in one platform
Compliance monitoring, evidence and board reporting
Privacy Act reform impacts, obligations, and practical security considerations
Monitoring and compliance support for critical infrastructure environments
A practical guide to securing critical infrastructure with continuous monitoring
A practical buyer’s guide for schools evaluating SIEM and SOC services
A practical guide to selecting the right SIEM and SOC service for local government
Articles on security operations, AI and compliance
Events, awards and company news
Read what our customers say about us
Solution briefs and datasheets
How we keep your data secure
Technical support and knowledge base
Guides, case studies, and advisories in one place
How AI agents investigate alerts and run security operations
Free ebook: a practical guide to adopting an AI SOC platform
A practical guide to incident response and digital forensics
Where SOAR playbooks fit and where AI agents take over
Free ebook: modern security operations with Microsoft Sentinel
How the framework is structured and what changes from the Essential Eight
November 13, 2026
November 10, 2026
November 6, 2026
We provide end-to-end SecOps solutions for Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs), Managed Service Providers (MSPs), and Value-Added Resellers (VARs).
Find out how you can become a ThreatDefence partner.
Protect your entire technology stack and build your SecOps on your own pace
White-labeled AI SOC for every client tenant, co-managed with our SOC team
Launch your SOC business without any upfront investment
Embed security operations, threat intelligence and exposure data in your product
Sovereign SOC for Australian MSPs and MSSPs, with onshore analysts and client data
Set the rules for closing alerts automatically, with evidence checks and review
How MSPs deliver branded security monitoring with a SOC partner
ThreatDefence was an official partner of the Cyber Resilience Summit NSW, 29 October 2026 at Hilton Sydney.
Our team was back at BSides Canberra, and our cyber quiz was a hit again.
Two days in Perth with our partner Ever Nimble, on security operations and cyber resilience.
Sponsors of the AUSCERT Cyber Security Conference on the Gold Coast.
Sponsors of the Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit in March.
Sponsors of the Cyber Security for Critical Assets Summit in Perth, February 2026.
Expert conversations with speakers and attendees at CyberCon Melbourne 2025.
Microsoft Entra ID, Intune, Defender, Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Sentinel can support the applicable ASD Essentials security actions, but none of them produces a rating on its own.
Entra ID, Intune, Defender and Microsoft 365 can enforce many Essential Eight controls and record whether they operate across the systems in scope. Microsoft Sentinel adds centralised logging, detection, investigation and response evidence.
The applicable chapter depends on the environment, whichever Microsoft products are deployed, and an ASD Essentials rating takes more than configuration settings or a Sentinel workspace. An environment delivered predominantly through SaaS and PaaS services starts with the cloud chapter, covered in the ASD Essentials for cloud guide.
A Microsoft component is scoped by what it does: its security function, the assets it protects and the systems it administers. That can put one component in more than one domain. ASD’s asset scoping guidance identifies Entra ID as an identity service and looks at how devices are used, including whether they support privileged administration.
Intune shows why product-based scoping falls short. Managed laptops belong in User devices, dedicated administrative devices also need consideration under Privileged environments, and the Intune service itself may be a business system when daily operations depend on it.
Microsoft operates the cloud services. The organisation stays accountable for the capabilities it enables and configures, and under ASD’s outsourced-services guidance that holds when another provider manages the tenant. ASD states that when a capability is offered but the organisation has not enabled or configured it, the responsibility has not been fulfilled. An available licence, a Conditional Access policy left in report-only mode and an audit setting that was never switched on are capabilities on offer. None is an operating control.
has not enabled or configured it, the responsibility has not been fulfilled.
For each component, name who maintains the configuration, which systems receive it and which record confirms it is working.
Conditional Access authentication strengths are how Microsoft Entra ID enforces phishing-resistant MFA. A strength can require passkeys (FIDO2), Windows Hello for Business or multifactor certificate-based authentication. ASD’s action reads: Use phishing-resistant MFA for users authenticating to systems, including from untrusted, external or high-risk locations.
Use phishing-resistant MFA for users authenticating to systems, including from untrusted, external or high-risk locations.
The action applies across technical domains. A policy protecting Microsoft 365 applications says nothing about other systems, administrative interfaces or authentication paths.
The method matters as much as the policy. ASD’s indicators rate SMS, voice and push-only MFA as not effective, so a policy that requires MFA without restricting methods may leave a gap against IT.PRO-13.4. A typical case is a tenant whose policy requires MFA and whose users still satisfy it by approving an authenticator push. Organisations using authenticator push should check the registered methods and the sign-ins their policies allowed.
Other identity settings also need review:
Disable protocols that cannot enforce modern authentication, or restrict and monitor them with compensating controls and a dated decommissioning plan (IT.PRO-13.5).
Under IT.PRO-13.4, keep break-glass accounts restricted, monitored, tested and reviewed, and exclude them from routine administration.
Disable or remove stale guests, test accounts and unused service principals, with documented, justified, hardened and monitored exceptions (IT.PRO-13.1).
Use distinct local administrator passwords across devices, for example through Windows LAPS (IT.PRO-13.6).
Compare the deployed policies, exclusions and report-only settings included, with sign-in records to see which methods users actually used. The Identity services guide covers the wider domain beyond Microsoft Entra ID.
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) in Microsoft Entra ID makes an administrator activate a role, for a limited time, before doing privileged work. That supports ASD’s secure administration actions, which include “time-bound privilege grants” before privileged actions are permitted. ASD’s indicators treat standing privileged access as not effective outside approved emergency arrangements.
PIM activation history shows who activated which role and for how long. Review it alongside the active assignments. An account with a standing assignment has no reason to activate, so an activation report alone will not show it.
Privileged work should run from dedicated, hardened environments separated from ordinary user workloads. Conditional Access can restrict administration to compliant, dedicated devices. Each administrative record identifies the user, timestamp and target of a change. Entra ID and Microsoft 365 logs capture many such events, but privileged administration may also occur through other platforms.
For assessment, trace a piece of privileged work end to end where the records allow: the role assignment, the activation, the administrative session and the change that resulted.
Microsoft Intune deploys approved security configurations to enrolled devices and detects drift, using security baselines, configuration profiles and compliance policies. ASD’s Secure configuration management actions call for baselines informed by vendor and industry hardening guidance and deployed across applicable systems.
A baseline assignment records the intent. It does not prove that every target device received the configuration or kept it. Compare the Intune enrolled-device inventory with the asset inventory, review each baseline’s device status and investigate devices that have not applied the policy or show drift. A laptop that never enrolled appears in neither Intune report, which is why the asset inventory comes first.
The record shows the approved version, the device groups that receive it, when the configuration changed and whether deviations were dealt with.
ASD’s indicators tie monitoring frequency to system criticality and change rate, so devices used for sensitive administration may justify closer review. ASD’s implementation planning guide works through a user-device baseline as an example. It reconciles enrolment with inventory, keeps version history for centrally deployed settings and records dated reviews, quarterly in that example.
Application control and Office macro restrictions are both deployed through Intune and Microsoft Defender, and both contribute to Trustworthy software and Secure configuration management in ASD Essentials. ASD’s Trustworthy software action is to Permit only supported, verified and organisation-authorised software to execute on systems, with exceptions minimised, formally risk accepted, time-bound, monitored and regularly reviewed.
Permit only supported, verified and organisation-authorised software to execute on systems,
On managed Windows devices, Intune can deploy App Control for Business policies, and Defender for Endpoint attack surface reduction rules can restrict Office child processes and macros that call Win32 APIs. Intune and the Cloud Policy service for Microsoft 365 can also manage Office macro settings centrally, including blocking macros in files from the internet.
Assess the two controls separately. Blocking internet-origin macros does nothing to stop unapproved executables, scripts or administrative utilities from running. ASD’s transition guide warns that Office macro controls address only part of the broader requirement to control software execution.
address only part of the broader requirement to control software execution.
Validate application control against the approved software inventory, the deployed policies and what actually ran. Defender advanced hunting shows allowed and blocked activity on onboarded devices. Check each of the following:
Permitted applications and execution methods match the authorised software set.
Policies address executables, scripts and administrative tooling as well as Office content.
Devices receive the intended policies and produce relevant block or execution events.
Approved deviations have a recorded justification, risk acceptance, end date and review history.
Applicable servers, unmanaged devices and other platforms have a suitable control approach.
ASD rates execution exceptions without formal approval or an end date as partially effective. A policy can be enforced on every device and still be marked down for how its exceptions are managed.
On managed devices, Intune delivers the updates and Microsoft Defender reports what is still missing. The Essential Eight strategies for patching applications and operating systems map to Vulnerability management, Asset identification and Legacy system management in ASD Essentials.
ASD’s action reads: Apply security patches or updates within defined risk-based timeframes or automatically where operational impact is low.
Apply security patches or updates within defined risk-based timeframes or automatically where operational impact is low.
Windows update rings manage Windows updates. Intune configuration profiles set Microsoft 365 Apps update behaviour. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management identifies missing patches and weak configurations on onboarded devices.
A device assigned to an update ring may still lack security updates, for example because it has been offline or an installation failed. Report the actual patch state from installation results and outstanding findings. The ring assignment shows only what was intended. Applicable ISM, regulatory and other mandatory deadlines continue to apply alongside risk-based prioritisation.
ASD’s fully effective indicators expect risk-based timeframes to be met consistently, coverage metrics for every applicable asset and formally risk accepted exclusions. A useful report lists each applicable asset with its missing updates, required timeframe, current status and any approved exception. It takes in the third-party applications, unmanaged devices and servers managed through other tools, none of which an Intune-only report would show.
For Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive and Teams, the relevant ASD Essentials actions cover inbound content inspection, exposed credentials and protected backups. The evidence needed is set by the content channels and important data in scope, whatever Microsoft licences are held.
Inbound content inspection (IT.PRO-09.3) applies in Boundary services and Critical processes and services. Exchange Online filtering, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 or a mail gateway can inspect inbound email, and attachment and link inspection in collaboration tools may help address other channels.
ASD also calls for identifying unsecured keys, secrets and credentials across codebases, configuration files, file shares and collaboration platforms. A password pasted into a Teams channel or saved in a SharePoint document is a typical case. Assess SharePoint, OneDrive and Teams content against the organisation’s scanning arrangements, and record when scans ran, which repositories were covered and whether exposed credentials were rotated or revoked.
unsecured keys, secrets and credentials
Important Microsoft 365 data also needs protected backups, with restoration tested against the organisation’s recovery objectives. Retention policies preserve information within Microsoft 365. They do not show that a mailbox, site or other important data can be restored after an incident.
Each piece of Microsoft 365 assessment evidence pairs an intended configuration with records showing the control operated, across the systems and the review period in scope.
ASD’s assessment process guide advises assessors to consider native capabilities before introducing additional products and to record each tool’s version, configuration and known limitations.
consider native capabilities before introducing additional products
The collection methods are common practice rather than ASD requirements. Confirm Microsoft menu names in the tenant being assessed.
Get-MgIdentityConditionalAccessPolicy
SigninLogs
AuthenticationDetails
AuditLogs
LoggedByService
PIM
DeviceEvents
ActionType
AppControlCodeIntegrityPolicyBlocked
Get-AdminAuditLogConfig
UnifiedAuditLogIngestionEnabled
OfficeActivity
Pair each configuration with the record that shows it working: Conditional Access exports with successful sign-ins, Intune compliance reports with the asset inventory, application control settings with execution records and backup configuration with successful restore tests. Dated system exports covering the assessment period are stronger than screenshots alone, though a screenshot is still useful when the tenant, scope and date are visible in it.
Record missing devices, unavailable telemetry and other limitations alongside the favourable findings. A passing Microsoft dashboard result is evidence for the checks that dashboard performs. It does not stand in for an ASD Essentials rating. Starting-point queries for federation edits and disabled audit logging are in ASD Essentials detection rules.
Microsoft Sentinel supports ASD Essentials in centralised event logging, detection, incident identification and documented response. ASD’s actions are technology-agnostic. No SIEM product is required or endorsed, and a deployed Sentinel workspace is not compliance in itself.
Sentinel aligns most directly with the detect principles, DET-01 to DET-05, and supports the respond principles, RES-03 to RES-05. Most of these actions sit within Visibility and response, a capability domain applying throughout the priority phases. Some are also assessed in technical domains, and these placements matter most for Sentinel:
IT.DET-01.1 and IT.DET-01.2 are assessed in every technical domain, so log sources, central collection and log protection are checked domain by domain.
DET-04 is assessed in Boundary services, Identity services, Critical processes and services, and Privileged environments, beginning with the priority phase 1 domains.
Existing Essential Eight logging and detection is the starting point. Check it against the applicable actions and domains.
SentinelHealth
A workspace with strong identity monitoring may hold little from servers, network infrastructure or non-Microsoft applications. Assess each principle against the assets and sources in its domain. The ASD Essentials Visibility and response guide explains the wider requirements behind these principles.
DET-01 asks for high-value security logs and configuration changes to be forwarded to protected central storage. In Microsoft Sentinel that work is done with data connectors, collection rules, workspace permissions and retention settings. The order is to decide which events each domain should produce, confirm they arrive, then protect them against unauthorised change.
Microsoft identifies Azure Activity logs, Sentinel Health, Office 365 audit logs and alerts from Defender products among its free data sources. Microsoft 365 E5 and similar licences also include a data grant of up to 5 MB per user per day for eligible Microsoft 365 data.
Check non-Microsoft sources too. Firewalls, VPN gateways, email gateways, non-Windows servers, SaaS applications and OT systems may require dedicated connectors or collection through Azure Monitor Agent or the Logs Ingestion API.
A connector showing as connected does not mean the relevant events are arriving. A typical case is a source that connects cleanly and then forwards only some of the event types its domain needs. Compare the expected source inventory with the tables received and the event activity in each domain. Separate the sources that are connected, the sources sending the required events and the sources whose data is unavailable or incomplete.
The tier chosen for a table decides which detection and investigation features can use its data. The analytics tier supports real-time detection, hunting and investigation. The data lake tier provides lower-cost historical retention for up to 12 years, with different querying and processing capabilities.
Keep sources required by analytics rules in the analytics tier. Eligible Sentinel tables have 90 days of analytics retention without additional retention charges, with extensions available up to two years.
Use the data lake tier for longer-term records useful for investigations and assessment that do not need real-time analytics.
Advanced hunting provides 30 days of history by default. Send the relevant tables into Sentinel where detections or investigations need longer access.
Moving data into the data lake tier removes it from real-time analytics. Historical queries remain possible through supported data lake operations, but ordinary analytics rules cannot operate on lake-only data.
Before changing a tier, review the tables each rule depends on and record which sources remain available for real-time detection. With that record, an assessor can read a lake-only table as a deliberate storage decision and not as missing collection. Microsoft Sentinel Cost Optimisation covers routing, filtering and retention planning.
Keep the people who administer monitored systems away from the permissions that change log collection, workspace access and retention. An administrator holding both can alter a system and then remove the record of it. Treat workspace role assignments, connector changes, data collection rule modifications and retention changes as security-relevant events and monitor them. The organisation can then show that logs are received and that unauthorised users cannot readily alter or remove them. ASD Essentials and SIEM covers ASD’s indicators for log protection and access.
DET-02 covers detection from normalised, time-synchronised and enriched logs. DET-03 covers identifying incidents from those detections and recording how they are investigated and classified. Microsoft Sentinel can support both. ASD’s IT.DET-03.1 action asks organisations to triage alerts and events in a timely manner.
triage alerts and events in a timely manner
ASIM parsers and ingestion-time transformations help normalise records from different sources, while UEBA, watchlists and threat intelligence add context for separating expected activity from events needing investigation.
A Sentinel incident keeps its alert details, classification, assignments and investigation activity. Automation rules can assign, tag and close incidents. A rule that closes routine alerts still needs a documented basis, and the case history it leaves has to make sense to a reviewer who was not involved.
For assessment, follow representative incidents from creation through triage, classification and closure, examining the supporting events, analyst decisions, automated changes and recorded outcomes.
ASD’s fully effective indicators for IT.DET-03.1 expect alerts to be triaged within the organisation’s defined timeframes, with performance tracked and reported.
This starting-point KQL query measures time from incident creation to first recorded modification, by severity, over the previous 30 days. It uses FirstModifiedTime as a proxy for the first analyst action. Automated incident updates can change that timestamp, so validate the result against the actual investigation workflow before using it as evidence of analyst response.
FirstModifiedTime
// Starting point: time from incident creation to first action, by severity SecurityIncident | where CreatedTime > ago(30d) | summarize arg_max(TimeGenerated, *) by IncidentNumber | extend MinutesToFirstAction = datetime_diff('minute', FirstModifiedTime, CreatedTime) | summarize Incidents = count(), MedianMinutes = percentile(MinutesToFirstAction, 50), P90Minutes = percentile(MinutesToFirstAction, 90) by Severity
DET-04 addresses baselined high-risk access activities, including malicious use of otherwise legitimate software and utilities. Defender for Endpoint process events show software execution on onboarded devices, while Entra ID records, Defender for Identity and UEBA provide identity context and behavioural baselines.
Check which endpoints produce process telemetry, which events are monitored and whether an investigator can tell approved activity from suspicious use. Privileged environments in ASD Essentials covers the baselines expected under DET-04, while ASD Essentials and SIEM covers KQL analysis of administrative tool execution.
Sentinel playbooks and supported Defender capabilities can isolate devices, disable accounts and revoke sessions. Each action, automated or started by an analyst, follows an approved procedure. The record names the incident, the authority to act, the action performed and the outcome observed.
Incident comments and tasks can also hold post-incident findings and records of external notifications. An assessor can then follow one incident from detection through investigation and response to follow-up. ASD Essentials and the SOC covers incident response planning, exercises and reporting obligations.
DET-05 Detection capability efficacy calls for evidence that security detections remain effective. Analytics rules that are enabled, or producing alerts, do not supply it. A rule can run successfully and still miss relevant activity because its data source is incomplete, its logic is unsuitable or the monitored assets are outside its coverage.
The SentinelHealth table records analytics rule execution outcomes once health monitoring is enabled. This query identifies analytics rules with failed executions during the previous 14 days:
// Starting point: analytics rules with failed runs SentinelHealth | where TimeGenerated > ago(14d) | where SentinelResourceType == "Analytics Rule" | where Status != "Success" | summarize Failures = count(), LastFailure = max(TimeGenerated), SampleReason = take_any(Description) by SentinelResourceName | order by Failures desc
Investigate each failed execution and keep the record of the fix. A clean run history is only half the answer, so add controlled tests or emulation for the highest-priority detections. For each test, record the expected detection, the observed result and any rule change that followed.
Coverage gaps to check:
Confirm collection from non-Microsoft systems, non-production environments and applicable OT assets.
Defender for Endpoint network protection operates on onboarded devices. Unmanaged systems and east-west traffic may require additional network monitoring.
Content hub analytics rules are a starting point. ASD’s indicators for IT.DET-02.2 expect detection logic covering unauthorised changes, anomalous authentication and suspicious software execution, tested and tuned on a cycle the organisation defines. Link each rule to its threat behaviour, data sources, covered assets, test result and latest tuning decision.
Check that incidents created overnight or at weekends were triaged within the organisation’s risk-defined timeframes.
Microsoft Sentinel is moving into the Microsoft Defender portal alongside Defender XDR. Update investigation procedures, runbooks and evidence collection steps before the Azure portal experience for Sentinel retires after March 31, 2027.
Expand Microsoft Sentinel Coverage covers extending visibility, detection and security operations around an existing Sentinel deployment.
ThreatDefence operates a 24x7 SOC with its team based in Australia, a 3 min average response under guaranteed SLAs, and threat hunting and an incident response retainer included in the standard service.
Response actions remain within the authority approved by each customer. Case records can be exported for an assessor or at the end of a contract. Australian customers’ data and AI processing stay in Australia.
ThreatDefence does not certify organisations. The assessor determines ASD Essentials ratings.
The ITDR module monitors risky app consents, session token replay and new MFA methods. The SOC can revoke sessions, remove an MFA method or block a sender within the customer’s approved response authority.
Through Microsoft Sentinel MDR, ThreatDefence operates on top of the customer’s existing Microsoft Sentinel workspace as a Microsoft Solutions Partner for Security. Data remains in the customer’s workspace, while AI agents and analysts query it in place using least-privilege roles assigned by the customer’s team.
In most environments, routing data to the appropriate Sentinel tier typically reduces Sentinel data costs by 50 to 70%.
Organisations can also review their current position action by action using the free ASD Essentials Navigator. Principle and domain results update as the assessment progresses. Readers new to the framework can start with the five-minute ASD Essentials explainer, which walks through principles, actions, domains, priority phases and ratings.
Open the ASD Essentials Navigator Start the 5-Minute Explainer Explore ASD Essentials Compliance
See how ThreatDefence automates security monitoring, compliance and cyber risk management in one platform.
CountryAustraliaUnited StatesNew ZealandUnited KingdomCanadaSingaporeOtherI'm an MSP, MSSP, or reseller
Δ
No. Secure Score measures posture against recommended Microsoft security actions, while ASD Essentials assesses the effectiveness of applicable actions within each domain. A high score says nothing about systems outside Microsoft’s visibility. It can point to configuration improvements, but its findings need operating evidence and assessment against the relevant ASD actions.
No. Sentinel can provide centralised logging, detection, incident records and evidence supporting Visibility and response, but ASD Essentials also covers identity, administration, configuration, software and backup. Sentinel coverage has to include relevant non-Microsoft systems, and timely response depends on the people and procedures operating the service.
Yes. Conditional Access authentication strengths can require passkeys (FIDO2), Windows Hello for Business or multifactor certificate-based authentication. IT.PRO-13.4 applies across technical domains, so assess every applicable authentication path, including those outside Microsoft 365. Review policy assignments, exclusions, registered methods and actual sign-in records to confirm users authenticate with phishing-resistant methods.
Yes. PIM supports secure administration through explicit activation and “time-bound privilege grants” under IT.PRO-05.2. The evidence shows who activated each role, for how long, and any standing assignments outside approved emergency arrangements. PIM does not replace IT.PRO-05.1, administration from dedicated, hardened environments, or IT.PRO-05.3, recording administrative changes with user, timestamp and target.
Partly. Intune manages Windows updates through update rings and Microsoft 365 Apps update behaviour, while Defender Vulnerability Management finds missing patches on onboarded devices. IT.PRO-06.2 asks for patches applied within defined risk-based timeframes or automatically where operational impact is low. ISM and regulatory deadlines still apply, and evidence has to cover third-party applications, unmanaged systems and servers patched elsewhere.
within defined risk-based timeframes or automatically where operational impact is low.
No. Retention settings do not show that important data can be recovered after an incident. Protected backups need to exist for data in scope, with restoration tested against recovery time and recovery point objectives. IT.PRO-10.3 addresses regular restoration testing, and ASD’s indicators rate testing that excludes important assets as partially effective. Keep job history and dated restore results.
Start with Microsoft 365 audit records and Entra ID sign-in and audit logs for the workloads in scope. Confirm audit logging is enabled, then verify that OfficeActivity, SigninLogs and AuditLogs records arrive in central storage, as IT.DET-01.2 covers. Alert when auditing is disabled, because that change stops new audit records without deleting existing ones.
No. Sentinel can operate independently, although it is commonly paired with Defender XDR, which provides endpoint, identity, email and cloud application detection and response. Sentinel adds broader log collection, custom detections, retention and cross-source investigations. Without Defender XDR, endpoint and identity telemetry from other tools has to support applicable actions, including DET-04.
Yes. Sentinel workspaces created in Australian Azure regions keep workspace data in Australia. Connected services, add-ons and AI capabilities may process or store data elsewhere, so organisations with sovereignty requirements should verify each one separately and never assume it follows the workspace. Keep the configuration and supplier assurance records.
Only if that period meets the organisation’s investigative, regulatory and contractual obligations. ASD sets no universal retention period, and IT.DET-01.3 expects retention to follow applicable requirements consistently across log types. Eligible tables include 90 days of analytics retention without extra charges, extendable to two years. The data lake tier holds up to 12 years, and Defender XDR advanced hunting keeps 30 days by default.
ASD Essentials Visibility and Response
ASD Essentials Identity Services and ITDR
Expand Microsoft Sentinel Coverage